Mozilla sent Firefox Version 29.0, referred to as Australis, to the release channel. No security updates are included in the update. Rather, the update to Australis incorporates major GUI (Graphic User Interface) changes. Some of those changes include are listed in my blog post, Mozilla Firefox 29 (http://securitygarden.blogspot.com/2014/04/mozilla-firefox-29.html).
What are your thoughts of the update? Personally, I didn't find anything in the update to be value added -- move value removed. Glad I switched to the Pale Moon browser.
Well I just stumbled on your post Corrine, so sure enough I restarted Firefox and low & behold it's ugly to look at for me, oops what's that, oh it's an Up-Date message from Pale Moon because I'm posting with that browser, I had it installed and set it up and everything moved over nicely from Firefox, but I never used it till now.
Joe
I've used Mozilla browsers from the days of K-Meleon, switched to Phoenix, which was renamed Firebird and finally renamed Firefox. Having used it for so many years, I have it highly customized. The incorporation of the "Bookmarks Toolbar" into the Nav bar is particularly important to me for getting to references and sites easily and the biggest problem with the new design of FF. Certainly, I could probably find an add-on that would solve the problem but I don't need to since Pale Moon works as expected. Besides, merely working with Firefox 29 for short periods of time today, it would hang and then resume.
For a discussion at Sysnative, I did a comparison between Pale Moon and Firefox 29 and annotated the differences that stood out the most for my usage.
(https://www.landzdown.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fv68%2FCorrine3%2FPaleMoon_FF29Comparison_zpsf1b1b052.jpg&hash=aab0e7824806d0ee30bf87f305c2ef3ca11b1032) (http://smg.photobucket.com/user/Corrine3/media/PaleMoon_FF29Comparison_zpsf1b1b052.jpg.html)
Full size: http://www.sysnative.com/forums/attachments/web-browsers/7870d1398818896-mozilla-firefox-version-29-0-released-palemoon_ff29-comparison.jpg
Fiddling with Theme Restorer (https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/classicthemerestorer/) for now.
Don't quite understand what all the fuss is but I guess that's just me.
Release notes (https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/29.0/releasenotes/) a full 24 hours after the release.
And all the known fixes - remaining vulnerabilities (https://www.mozilla.org/security/known-vulnerabilities/firefox.html).
After using FF for many years, I must admit I was slightly reluctant to switch over to Pale Moon.
I am now very happy I did. Great browser, and the developer does not make changes for changes sake!!.... :mitch:
I looked FF29 over yesterday and the thing that stood out for me was the amount of vertical space the UI uses. Given that wide screens are all the rage currently, this tactic loses a chunk of the most valuable screen estate, height.
Study Corrine's screenshots above, Pale Moon uses way less screen height yet allows easier access to more items/options, etc.
Mozilla, I bought a 1920x1200 over an HD 1920x1080 screen to see more web content, not for you to waste that advantage with slivers of blank UI.
What are Mozilla thinking about?!
The Pale Moon developer shared this comparison chart: Firefox/Pale Moon feature table (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1CT9YLUjMyb5Xf8HHcQ66lVh-SALb7cWTmUKgeJOvk00/pubhtml)
Until someone can provide a compelling why I should move over to Pale Moon in lieu of Firefox - I'll stay with Firefox as it serves my purposes.
It isn't my default Browser anyway - proudly posting via Internet Explorer (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Explorer)
I'd suggest no one could provide a compelling reason, it's really down to the way you work with your browser and what you expect from it.
For me over the last 4-5 years Pale Moon has been almost invisible, even when testing the Beta versions that don't get to being released publicly,
For speed, sometimes PM x64 beats all in testing, sometimes PM x86 is better.
Other browsers can be faster on certain releases/builds but that really isn't the issue.
The main things for me are stability and ease of use/minimal actions needed. Pale Moon just works. It's almost a see-through browser, it just doesn't get in the way of my day-to-day usage. I use and test almost all of the common and alternative browsers available, there's only one I keep going back to.
Quote from: satrow on May 05, 2014, 03:02:36 AM
I'd suggest no one could provide a compelling reason, it's really down to the way you work with your browser and what you expect from it.
Oh no; Browser Wars (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Browser_wars).
Nah, no wars. :D IE 11 is an excellent browser. It just doesn't accommodate the extensions I use regularly. Plus, I really do like the customizations that I've made.
Internet Explorer 11 certainly is modern (http://www.modern.ie/en-us).
Version 29.0.1 release notes only (https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/29.0.1/releasenotes/)
Corrine surely will post the advisories as they become available. You may fetch the new build internally (via the software) or using a stand-alone installer.
https://download.mozilla.org/?product=firefox-stub&os=win&lang=en-US
I've disabled setup telemetry as I don't want to send Mozilla whatever is included in the setup telemetry nor do I want this as part of my software setup regimen.
Still refreshing the Security Advisories for Firefox (https://www.mozilla.org/security/known-vulnerabilities/firefox.html) page with no changes from the release of version 29.0, even though security updates are linked from the Release Notes that siljaline posted.
Disable all telemetry via this Mozilla KB article (https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/send-performance-data-improve-firefox).
As enabled telemetry does collect information from you:
QuoteUsage statistics or "Telemetry" is a feature in Firefox that sends Mozilla usage, performance, and responsiveness statistics about user interface features, memory and hardware configuration. Your IP address is also collected as a part of a standard web log. Usage statistics are transmitted using SSL and help us improve future versions of Firefox. Once sent to Mozilla, usage statistics are aggregated and made available to a broad range of developers, including both Mozilla employees and public contributors.
I've been on a bit of a browser kick lately since trying Pale Moon for a few weeks and the recent IE scare. I tried FF years ago and ultimately decided to delete it and stick with IE, yet now I cannot remember why.
Like siljaline stated earlier, I don't understand the actual benefits/differences of using PM instead of FF. In fact, when I run programs such as CCleaner, it states that it's cleaning FF-related items, even though I had PM, not FF, installed. Interesting. It appears my computer reads PM as FF. (yup, put me on the 'stupid' list)
Also, a "thank you" nod to siljaline for mentioning telemetry. Nice to learn. I hate snoops! Funny thing is, PM does not offer any tab in advanced options for "Data choices", whereas FF does. Maybe there's a way to turn off telemetry in PM, but I couldn't find it. Thus, I have now downloaded FF 29.0 to check it out. Hmmm, that now gives me 3 browsers to fool around with.
Still reading and learning. Please continue. :wink:
Just wanted to report that I did update to FF 29, and with the help of the Classic Restore extension and a couple others, have Firefox configured in a way that works for me.
Functionally, there are some problems in the default installation---like the bookmarks star icon sending stuff to the unsorted bookmarks instead of giving you a choice what to do with them. Somehow, the addition of the little animation didn't make up for not having flexibility where to send the bookmark. However, that too was remedied with an extension.
I figure as long as I can somehow make it do what I want, I'll stay in the development queue. If they really mess up though, I'll probably go to Pale Moon.
JDBush61, Pale Moon doesn't use telemetry, it hasn't since long before version 12 (over 2 years ago) if it ever did.
Ccleaner doesn't differentiate between FF and PM - unless you use the winapp2.ini (http://forum.piriform.com/index.php?showtopic=32310 - which includes a check box for PM Telemetry - that's one for your stupid list) - even then, CC itself might bug you to close PM when there are no PM related boxes checked.
There's a post on the PM forum which contains details of how they differed at the release of the first PM 24 version, back in mid-September: http://forum.palemoon.org/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=3048
That PM Announcements section contains both older and newer details, should anyone want to go back further or get updated on more recent changes/differences.
QuoteA note about features different from Firefox
Pale Moon 24.0 deviates from Firefox in a number of ways. The most important changes are outlined below:
Pale Moon retains the graphical tab switching pane with quick filter in lieu of the removed Tab Groups feature.
The tab switching pane is accessed from Ctrl+Tab -> Show all {n} tabs or by hitting Ctrl+Shift+Tab
Pale Moon retains the option to hide the tab bar with only one tab. If you prefer to work with multiple, single-page windows, you won't be wasting any screen space. Like in Firefox versions prior to 23, there is an option to "Always show the tab bar" in your Options -> Tabs pane to control this feature.
Pale Moon retains and expands on the browser-wide option to load images in web pages. In your Options -> Content pane, you will find options to apply to the browser overall:
- Load images automatically: loads images in web pages automatically (the default) if the are not otherwise blocked per-site
- Never load images: prevent images from loading, e.g. very useful for very slow wireless/sat connections or on tightly-metered connections to save bandwidth and allowed internet volume
- Originating server only: only loads images from the website you are visiting, and doesn't load images from other sites. Your results may vary with this option selected
In addition, you can fine-tune this behavior per-site by checking "Page info" (in the right-click menu of a page) -> Permissions -> "Load images"
More recovery options in the safe mode dialog box. Contrary to Firefox which only allows you to start in safe mode or to completely reset your user profile, Pale Moon offers you a number of options for troubleshooting without having to completely reset or do advanced troubleshooting in safe mode manually. You will have the option to Disable all add-ons and start the browser that way, Reset toolbars and controls (if the UI is messed up), Reset the bookmarks database in case of serious corruption, Reset all user preferences, and reset search providers in case they got corrupted or hijacked.
Resetting your profile is instead done from Help -> Troubleshooting information after you have started the browser, in case of serious trouble (hopefully you won't need this very often ;) ).
Pale Moon retains the "Send Link" "Send Page" options for quick sending of a URL in your default e-mail client. This saves you from having to manually copy and paste the URL of a page.
Pale Moon displays secure sites differently than Firefox - for a more in-depth explanation, see this post: http://forum.palemoon.org/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=2048.
No WebRTC. Pale Moon does not include WebRTC functionality.
Both by popular vote and because it would go beyond the scope of a web browser, WebRTC is not included in Pale Moon. Pale Moon aims to remain a web browser and not become a pseudo-voice/video chat client; there are plenty of dedicated programs out there for that purpose already. In addition, it's not even a W3C recommendation or part of any standard at the moment.
No Telemetry, no Health Report. Pale Moon values your privacy and will not collect, store or send any data about the browser's behavior (and as a result, your browsing behavior) anywhere.
"the bookmarks star icon sending stuff to the unsorted bookmarks instead of giving you a choice what to do with them..."
If you DOUBLE-CLICK on the bookmarks star, it will immediately offer you an opportunity to place/sort your bookmark into the bookmark folder of your choice.
Alternatively, if you clicked only once --- placing it in the "unsorted bookmarks" folder, you should note the star icon changed from an "outline", to a "solid-blue" (representing EDIT MODE): you can then click on it again, to edit/move the bookmark as desired.
[Credit: I picked-up this trick/feature from Hernan "Iroc9555"]
Among other Mozilla revelations of late, the Firefox Team plans on adding semi-silent updates to old versions to get everyone current (http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9248411/Mozilla_plans_semi_silent_updates_to_tug_laggards_onto_the_newest_Firefox)
Those running old versions should be current ! But holds-outs *Not Advised* could disable the Maintenance Service (https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/what-mozilla-maintenance-service).
Agreed! Not advised. Better to move to Pale Moon if you don't want the Firefox auto update feature that will include Adobe Flash and/or Microsoft Silverlight.
I find it interesting that Firefox is including BOTH Flash and Silverlight. No other browser is doing both, are they?
As I read it, the auto-update feature being discussed will update just Firefox itself... but not other add-ons / extensions.
Flash, for example, has its updates controlled upon installation and/or via the Flash Player entry in one's control panel --- click therein on the Advanced tab to set/change how you want Flash to go about updating [including the "not recommended" choice of "never check(ing) for updates".
Internet Explorer also allows users to install both Flash and Silverlight.
Indeed, while Flash and Silverlight are similar in functionality, they are invoked on different sites. Silverlight is sometimes described as "Microsoft's proprietary analog of Flash", as it is used (instead of Flash) on many Microsoft sites.
Here is a Silverlight test http://www.bubblemark.com/silverlight2.html
Here is the corresponding Flash test http://www.bubblemark.com/flex.htm
[And here is a java version http://www.bubblemark.com/java.html ]
You'll need each, in order to view content on all sites.
Martin Brinkmann writes:
QuoteMozilla launched in-content tabs in Firefox 15 to get away from the settings window that opens up when you click on options in the browser. With Firefox 32, Firefox will load preferences in a tab by default.
http://www.ghacks.net/2014/05/19/firefox-32-preferences-open-tab-default/
Yes siljaline!
Pale Moon author confirms that browser will not ship with EME, ads or Australis (http://www.ghacks.net/2014/05/21/palemoon-author-confirms-browser-will-ship-eme-ads-australis/)
A number of folks are noting with Firefox 29.0.1 | https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/firefox-already-running-not-responding
Firefox 30.0 is slated for release on or about June 10.
Thanks, siljaline. That was listed under Known Issues (https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/29.0.1/releasenotes/) with the 29.0.1 update. With so many affected, it seems like a rather serious bug for the release to have gone forward before being resolved.
Quoteunresolved Slow shut downs lead to 'Firefox is already running' warning (see 966469 (http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/966469) and 985655 (http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/985655)
We'll see within the release notes of Firefox 30.0 if the unexpected shutdown | app hangs are fixed.
FF Beta 30 does not have these issues fix for those that may have thought installing the 30.0 Beta would beat-the-heat, it won't.
OT Saved from the Recycle Bin.